CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar

Myanmar: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
2 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
79th
of 85 countries
All-time high
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
All-time low
2 1=low to 6=high
in 2021
Years of data
13
2013–2025

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar, 2013–2025

00.511.522.52013201920252013: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 2 1=low to 6=high2022: 2 1=low to 6=high2023: 2 1=low to 6=high2024: 2 1=low to 6=high2025: 2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar stood at 2 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.

The figure is down 20.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2021.

That places Myanmar 79th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar, year by year

Annual values for CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) in Myanmar, 2013 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2013 2.5 1=low to 6=high
2014 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 2 1=low to 6=high -20.0%
2022 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 7
2020s 2.08 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Myanmar

  1. 79 Afghanistan 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 79 Eritrea 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 79 Haiti 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 79 Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 79 Timor-Leste 2 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Myanmar

All data for Myanmar →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar?
Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Myanmar?
The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Myanmar?
The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2021.
How does Myanmar rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
Myanmar ranks 79th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Myanmar?
Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Myanmar data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/myanmar/">CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Myanmar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.