CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
2 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
79th
of 85 countries
All-time high
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2007
All-time low
2 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
20
2006–2025

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste, 2006–2025

00.511.522.52006201520252006: 2 1=low to 6=high2007: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 2 1=low to 6=high2012: 2 1=low to 6=high2013: 2 1=low to 6=high2014: 2 1=low to 6=high2015: 2 1=low to 6=high2016: 2 1=low to 6=high2017: 2 1=low to 6=high2018: 2 1=low to 6=high2019: 2 1=low to 6=high2020: 2 1=low to 6=high2021: 2 1=low to 6=high2022: 2 1=low to 6=high2023: 2 1=low to 6=high2024: 2 1=low to 6=high2025: 2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

In 2025, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste stood at 2 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 20 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

That places Timor-Leste 79th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 20 years of available data.

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste, year by year

Annual values for CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high) in Timor-Leste, 2006 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2006 2 1=low to 6=high
2007 2.5 1=low to 6=high +25.0%
2008 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 2 1=low to 6=high -20.0%
2012 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.38 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 4
2010s 2.05 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 2 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Timor-Leste

  1. 79 Afghanistan 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 79 Eritrea 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 79 Haiti 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 79 Myanmar 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 79 Sudan 2 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Timor-Leste

All data for Timor-Leste →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste?
Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Timor-Leste?
The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Timor-Leste?
The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Timor-Leste rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
Timor-Leste ranks 79th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Timor-Leste?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Timor-Leste data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/timor-leste/">CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Timor-Leste</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.