CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in East Timor
East Timor: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in East Timor, 2006–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in East Timor stood at 2 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 20 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in East Timor peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.
That places East Timor 79th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 20 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in East Timor, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2007 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +25.0% |
| 2008 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -20.0% |
| 2012 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
East Timor compared with similar countries
- East Timor's 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 57% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
- East Timor's 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 67% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.38 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
| 2010s | 2.05 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near East Timor
More public sector data for East Timor
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 33.13 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0249 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -15.81 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 46.40 million current USD (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in East Timor?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in East Timor was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in East Timor?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in East Timor?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- How does East Timor rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- East Timor ranks 79th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in East Timor?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this East Timor data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.