Statizoid

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend

Post-demographic dividend: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
3rd
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend, 2005–2013

012342005200920132005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Post-demographic dividend 3rd out of 42 groups with data for 2013, putting it in the top 10%.

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2007 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.4 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4

Countries ranked near Post-demographic dividend

  1. 1 Rwanda 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 1 Togo 4.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 3 Benin 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 3 Bhutan 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 3 Burkina Faso 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 3 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 3 Côte d'Ivoire 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 3 Fiji 4 1=low to 6=high
  9. 3 Grenada 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 3 Guinea 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 3 India 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 3 Kenya 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 3 Republic of Moldova 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 3 Saint Lucia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 3 Viet Nam 4 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 3 Zimbabwe 4 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Post-demographic dividend

All data for Post-demographic dividend →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend?
Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Post-demographic dividend?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Post-demographic dividend rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
Post-demographic dividend ranks 3rd out of 42 groups with data for 2013.
Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Post-demographic dividend?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Post-demographic dividend data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/post-demographic-dividend/">CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Post-demographic dividend</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.