CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Kiribati
Kiribati: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Kiribati, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Kiribati stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Kiribati peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Kiribati ranks 9th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2020 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 9 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Benin 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cote d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Georgia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Micronesia (country) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Rwanda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kiribati
- Tax revenue 17.5% (2023)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 7.4% (2023)
- Taxes on goods and services 11.8% (2023)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 7.1% (2023)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -1.4% (2023)
- Interest payments 0.7% (2023)
- Grants and other revenue 80.4% (2023)
- Interest payments 0.8% (2023)
- Compensation of employees 31.4% (2023)
- Goods and services expense 29.4% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Kiribati?
- Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Kiribati was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Kiribati rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Kiribati ranks 9th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.