CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Moldova
Moldova: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Moldova, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Moldova is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Moldova peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Moldova 9th out of 84 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Moldova, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
- 9 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Benin 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Cote d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Georgia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Micronesia (country) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Rwanda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 9 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Moldova
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 46.09 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0061 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 17.34 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 110.73 million current USD (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre 2,866 current USD per square kilometre (2023)
- Tax revenue 18.6% (2023)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 124.55 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 12.4% (2023)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 25.94 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 10.33 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Moldova?
- Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Moldova was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Moldova rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Moldova ranks 9th out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
- Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.