CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Mongolia
Mongolia: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Mongolia, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Mongolia recorded 3 1=low to 6=high for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Mongolia peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Mongolia ranks 31st of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Mongolia, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near Mongolia
- 31 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Congo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high
- 31 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Laos 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Tanzania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Mongolia
- Arms imports 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.8737 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -88 % change on previous year (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 51.31 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0076 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 62.24 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 180.84 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 1.93 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Mongolia?
- Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Mongolia was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Mongolia?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Mongolia?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Mongolia rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Mongolia ranks 31st out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
- Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Mongolia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Mongolia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.