Statizoid

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal

Nepal: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
31st
of 84 countries
All-time high
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
All-time low
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 3 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3 1=low to 6=high2025: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Nepal 31st out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 2.5 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3 1=low to 6=high +20.0%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 2.5 1=low to 6=high -16.7%
2009 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3 1=low to 6=high +20.0%
2013 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.7 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2.5 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Nepal

  1. 31 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 31 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 31 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 31 Congo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 31 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 31 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 31 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 31 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 31 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 31 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 31 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 31 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 31 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 31 Mongolia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 31 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 31 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 31 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 31 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 31 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 31 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 31 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Nepal

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal?
Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Nepal?
The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Nepal?
The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Nepal rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
Nepal ranks 31st out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Nepal?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Nepal data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-property-rights-and-rule-based-governance-rating-1-low-to-6-high/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-property-rights-and-rule-based-governance-rating-1-low-to-6-high/nepal/">CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Nepal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.