CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Solomon Islands
Solomon Islands: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Solomon Islands, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Solomon Islands recorded 3 1=low to 6=high for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Solomon Islands peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Solomon Islands ranks 31st of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Solomon Islands, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.7 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.92 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Solomon Islands
- 31 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Burkina Faso 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Congo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Fiji 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Lesotho 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Mongolia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 31 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Solomon Islands
- Tax revenue 23.3% (2024)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 22.7% (2024)
- Taxes on goods and services 26.4% (2024)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 7.7% (2024)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) -1.9% (2024)
- Interest payments 1.5% (2024)
- Grants and other revenue 37.4% (2024)
- Interest payments 1.3% (2022)
- Other taxes 0.9% (2020)
- Compensation of employees 47.3% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Solomon Islands?
- Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Solomon Islands was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Solomon Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
- What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Solomon Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Solomon Islands rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
- Solomon Islands ranks 31st out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Solomon Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Solomon Islands data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.