CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Angola
Angola: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Angola, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2013, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Angola stood at 2.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Angola peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Angola 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Angola, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Angola compared with similar countries
- Angola's 2.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 83% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Angola's 2.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 83% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Angola
- 57 Burundi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Dominica 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea-Bissau 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Liberia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Micronesia, Federated States of 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Mozambique 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Myanmar 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Nicaragua 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Niger 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Nigeria 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Tuvalu 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Zimbabwe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Angola
- Arms imports 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.4223 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 6.67 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 24.34 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0089 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -26.11 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 922.05 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 12.03 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Angola?
- Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Angola was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Angola?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Angola?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Angola rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Angola ranks 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Angola?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Angola data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.