CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low) in Micronesia (country)
Micronesia (country): CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low) was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Micronesia (country), 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Micronesia (country) recorded 2.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in 2025. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Micronesia (country) peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Micronesia (country) 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low) in Micronesia (country), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Micronesia (country) compared with similar countries
- Micronesia (country)'s 2.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 71% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Micronesia (country)'s 2.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 83% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)
- 57 Angola 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Burundi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Democratic Republic of Congo 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Dominica 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea-Bissau 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Liberia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Mozambique 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Myanmar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Nicaragua 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Niger 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Nigeria 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Tuvalu 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Zimbabwe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Micronesia (country)
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 62.15 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0158 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Micronesia (country)?
- Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Micronesia (country) was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Micronesia (country) rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.