CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Tuvalu, 2012–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Tuvalu recorded 2.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 28.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Tuvalu peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2020.
That places Tuvalu 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 14 years of available data.
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 8 |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
- 57 Angola 2.5 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Burundi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Dominica 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Guinea-Bissau 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Liberia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Micronesia, Federated States of 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Mozambique 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Myanmar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Nicaragua 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Niger 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Nigeria 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Somalia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Zimbabwe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Tuvalu
- Revenue, General government, Percent of GDP 110.49 (2030)
- Expenditure, General government, Percent of GDP 116.53 (2030)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 50 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 60.38 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments 0.0% (2025)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data 15 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for 22.95 (2024)
- CPIA business regulatory environment rating 2.5 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA debt policy rating 2 1=low to 6=high (2025)
- CPIA economic management cluster average 2.67 1=low to 6=high (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Tuvalu?
- Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Tuvalu was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- How does Tuvalu rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Tuvalu ranks 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Tuvalu?
- Over the last ten years it is down 28.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.