CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros

Comoros: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
2 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
78th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2016
All-time low
1.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 2 1=low to 6=high2006: 1.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 1.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 1.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 2 1=low to 6=high2010: 2 1=low to 6=high2011: 2 1=low to 6=high2012: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 2 1=low to 6=high2014: 2 1=low to 6=high2015: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 2.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 2 1=low to 6=high2021: 2 1=low to 6=high2022: 2 1=low to 6=high2023: 2 1=low to 6=high2024: 2 1=low to 6=high2025: 2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros is 2 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.

That represents a change of down 20.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2016 and was at its lowest, 1.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

Comoros ranks 78th of 85 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros, year by year

Annual values for CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high) in Comoros, 2005 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 2 1=low to 6=high
2006 1.5 1=low to 6=high -25.0%
2007 1.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 1.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 2 1=low to 6=high +33.3%
2010 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 2.5 1=low to 6=high +25.0%
2013 2 1=low to 6=high -20.0%
2014 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 2.5 1=low to 6=high +25.0%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +20.0%
2017 2.5 1=low to 6=high -16.7%
2018 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 2.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 2 1=low to 6=high -20.0%
2021 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.7 1=low to 6=high 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 2.35 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 2 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 2 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Comoros

  1. 78 Haiti 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 78 Marshall Islands 2 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 81 Afghanistan 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Comoros

All data for Comoros →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros?
Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Comoros?
The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2016.
What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Comoros?
The lowest recorded value was 1.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Comoros rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
Comoros ranks 78th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Comoros?
Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Comoros data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/comoros/">CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Comoros</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.