CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Haiti
Haiti: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Haiti, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Haiti is 2 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Haiti peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2019.
That places Haiti 78th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Haiti, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2014 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2019 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -33.3% |
| 2020 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Haiti compared with similar countries
- Haiti's 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 67% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Haiti's 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 67% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.65 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Haiti
- 78 Comoros 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 78 Marshall Islands 2 1=low to 6=high compare
- 81 Afghanistan 1.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Haiti
- Arms imports 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (1985)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 1.62 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (1985)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (1985)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -25 % change on previous year (1983)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 10.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (1985)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 1.68 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0008 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 67.58 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 19.75 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 362.85 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (1985)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Haiti?
- Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Haiti was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- How does Haiti rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Haiti ranks 78th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Haiti?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.