CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Marshall Islands
Marshall Islands: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Marshall Islands, 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Marshall Islands stood at 2 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is down 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Marshall Islands peaked at 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2024.
That places Marshall Islands 78th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Marshall Islands, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -20.0% |
| 2025 | 2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Marshall Islands compared with similar countries
- Marshall Islands's 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 57% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Marshall Islands's 2 1=low to 6=high is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 67% of the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 2.33 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Marshall Islands
More public sector data for Marshall Islands
- Tax revenue 17.2% (2020)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 9.7% (2020)
- Taxes on goods and services 8.4% (2020)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 8.8% (2020)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) 5.0% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.4% (2020)
- Grants and other revenue 75.8% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.5% (2020)
- Other taxes 0.8% (2020)
- Compensation of employees 35.3% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Marshall Islands?
- Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Marshall Islands was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Marshall Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2024.
- How does Marshall Islands rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
- Marshall Islands ranks 78th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Marshall Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Marshall Islands data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.