Statizoid

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states

Other small states: CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.06 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 4.3%
Rank
14th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.14 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
All-time low
2.86 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2015: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2024: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Other small states recorded 3.06 1=low to 6=high for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in 2025.

That represents a change of up 4.3% on the previous year and up 4.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states peaked at 3.14 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2.86 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

Other small states ranks 14th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high —
2006 2.86 1=low to 6=high -4.8%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +5.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.07 1=low to 6=high +2.4%
2010 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3 1=low to 6=high -2.3%
2013 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 2.93 1=low to 6=high -2.4%
2015 2.93 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +2.4%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.07 1=low to 6=high +2.4%
2019 3.14 1=low to 6=high +2.3%
2020 3.07 1=low to 6=high -2.3%
2021 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.07 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 2.94 1=low to 6=high -4.4%
2025 3.06 1=low to 6=high +4.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.99 1=low to 6=high 2.86 1=low to 6=high 3.07 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.02 1=low to 6=high 2.93 1=low to 6=high 3.14 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.05 1=low to 6=high 2.94 1=low to 6=high 3.07 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Other small states

  1. 16 Azerbaijan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 16 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 16 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 16 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 16 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 16 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 16 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 16 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 16 Honduras 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 16 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 16 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 16 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 16 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 16 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 16 Tanzania, United Republic of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 16 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 16 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 16 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 16 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 16 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Other small states

All data for Other small states →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states?
Cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Other small states?
The highest recorded value was 3.14 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
What is the lowest cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating recorded in Other small states?
The lowest recorded value was 2.86 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Other small states rank for cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating?
Other small states ranks 14th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia quality of budgetary and financial management rating rising or falling in Other small states?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Other small states data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/other-small-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-budgetary-and-financial-management-rating-1-low-to-6-high/other-small-states/">CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating in Other small states</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA quality of budgetary and financial management rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The quality of budgetary and financial management criterion assesses the extent to which there is: (a) a comprehensive and credible budget, linked to policy priorities; (b) effective financial management systems to ensure that the budget is implemented as intended in a controlled and predictable way; and (c) timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely audit of public accounts and effective arrangements for follow up.