CPIA quality of public administration rating in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: CPIA quality of public administration rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2010. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Azerbaijan, 2005–2010
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia quality of public administration rating in Azerbaijan is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2010. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
That places Azerbaijan 28th out of 84 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 1 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
- 28 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Honduras 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Kosovo 3 1=low to 6=high
- 28 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Republic of Moldova 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Tajikistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Togo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 28 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Azerbaijan
- Arms imports 28.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 2.74 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0004 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 833.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 28.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 370.2 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0507 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.05 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 3.78 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 36.3 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of public administration rating in Azerbaijan?
- Cpia quality of public administration rating in Azerbaijan was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2010, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
- Azerbaijan ranks 28th out of 84 countries with data for 2010.
- Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).