Statizoid

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Bolivia, Plurinational State of: CPIA quality of public administration rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling

Latest (2015)
3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
28th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, 2005–2015

012342005201020152005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Bolivia, Plurinational State of recorded 3 1=low to 6=high for cpia quality of public administration rating in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

That represents a change of down 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.

That places Bolivia, Plurinational State of 28th out of 85 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.5 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3 1=low to 6=high -14.3%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.1 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Bolivia, Plurinational State of

  1. 28 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 28 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 28 Cambodia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 28 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 28 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 28 Gambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 28 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 28 Honduras 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 28 Kosovo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 28 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 28 Maldives 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 28 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 28 Republic of Moldova 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 28 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 28 Niger 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 28 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 28 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 28 Tajikistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 28 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 28 Togo 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 28 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 28 Zimbabwe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 28 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of

All data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
Cpia quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
How does Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 28th out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bolivia, Plurinational State of data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-public-administration-rating-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-quality-of-public-administration-rating-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/">CPIA quality of public administration rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).