CPIA quality of public administration rating in Congo
Congo: CPIA quality of public administration rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Congo, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Congo recorded 2.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia quality of public administration rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of public administration rating in Congo peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2019 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Congo 51st out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Congo, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 51 Bangladesh 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Burundi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Chad 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Laos 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Liberia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Micronesia (country) 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Nepal 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Nigeria 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Sao Tome and Principe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Tuvalu 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Vanuatu 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Congo
- Arms imports 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.5091 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -66.67 % change on previous year (2015)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 28.75 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0116 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -36.12 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 182.04 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 8.78 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of public administration rating in Congo?
- Cpia quality of public administration rating in Congo was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2019.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Congo rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
- Congo ranks 51st out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).