CPIA quality of public administration rating in Micronesia (country)
Micronesia (country): CPIA quality of public administration rating was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Micronesia (country), 2011–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia quality of public administration rating in Micronesia (country) stood at 2.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of public administration rating in Micronesia (country) peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
Micronesia (country) ranks 51st of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Micronesia (country), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.56 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 9 |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)
- 51 Bangladesh 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Burundi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Chad 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Congo 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Laos 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Liberia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Nepal 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Nigeria 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Sao Tome and Principe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Tuvalu 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 51 Vanuatu 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Micronesia (country)
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 62.15 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0158 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Tax revenue 7.0% (2020)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 10.9% (2020)
- Taxes on goods and services 3.4% (2020)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 10.5% (2020)
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) 6.9% (2020)
- Interest payments 0.4% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of public administration rating in Micronesia (country)?
- Cpia quality of public administration rating in Micronesia (country) was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Micronesia (country) rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 51st out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).