CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) in Tuvalu
Tuvalu: CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA quality of public administration rating in Tuvalu, 2012–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia quality of public administration rating in Tuvalu stood at 2.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the lowest value across all 14 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia quality of public administration rating in Tuvalu peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2012.
That places Tuvalu 52nd out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high) in Tuvalu, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2013 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2015 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2016 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Tuvalu compared with similar countries
- Tuvalu's 2.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 71% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Tuvalu's 2.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.56 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 8 |
| 2020s | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tuvalu
- 52 Bangladesh 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Burundi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Central African Republic 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Chad 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Congo 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Kiribati 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Laos 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Lesotho 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Liberia 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Madagascar 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Malawi 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Micronesia (country) 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Nepal 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Nigeria 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Papua New Guinea 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Sao Tome and Principe 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 52 Vanuatu 2.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Tuvalu
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Revenue, General government, Percent of GDP 110.49 (2030)
- Expenditure, General government, Percent of GDP 116.53 (2030)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score 50 scale 0-100 (2024)
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score 60.38 scale 0-100 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia quality of public administration rating in Tuvalu?
- Cpia quality of public administration rating in Tuvalu was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Tuvalu?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2014.
- What is the lowest cpia quality of public administration rating recorded in Tuvalu?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- How does Tuvalu rank for cpia quality of public administration rating?
- Tuvalu ranks 52nd out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia quality of public administration rating rising or falling in Tuvalu?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA quality of public administration rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA Quality of Public Administration criterion covers the core administration defined as the civilian central government (and subnational governments, to the extent that their size or policy responsibilities are significant) excluding health and education personnel, and police. The criterion assesses the functioning of the core administration in three areas: (a) managing its own operations; (b) ensuring quality in policy implementation and regulatory management; and (c) coordinating the larger public sector Human Resources Management regime outside the core administration (de-concentrated and arms-length bodies and subsidiary governments).