CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): CPIA structural policies cluster average was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) stood at 3.1 1=low to 6=high.
The figure is down 2.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) peaked at 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009 and was at its lowest, 3.06 1=low to 6=high, in 2023.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th of 42 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | -2.1% |
| 2007 | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +2.1% |
| 2010 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | -1.4% |
| 2012 | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | -0.5% |
| 2014 | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2016 | 3.19 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.11 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2020 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2021 | 3.07 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2022 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2023 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +1.2% |
| 2025 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.11 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
More public sector data for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Arms imports 872.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.4073 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -41.87 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 872.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 161.96 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0156 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 6.25 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 346.78 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 93.74 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Cpia structural policies cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- What is the lowest cpia structural policies cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.06 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank for cpia structural policies cluster average?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia structural policies cluster average rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA structural policies cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Structural Policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.