CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA building human resources rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Bosnia and Herzegovina recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia building human resources rating in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Bosnia and Herzegovina 39th out of 85 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina compared with similar countries
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 88% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Bosnia and Herzegovina's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 88% of the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 39 Bolivia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Eritrea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 39 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 39 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Solomon Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 3.7 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0005 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2021)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia building human resources rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Cpia building human resources rating in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for cpia building human resources rating?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 39th out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.