CPIA building human resources rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of
Bolivia, Plurinational State of: CPIA building human resources rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling
CPIA building human resources rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, 2005–2015
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia building human resources rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of down 12.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2011.
That places Bolivia, Plurinational State of 39th out of 85 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- 39 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Eritrea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high
- 39 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Solomon Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Arms imports 0 SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -23.53 % change on previous year (2020)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 0 SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 24 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2020)
- Tax revenue 17.0% (2007)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 309 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 9.6% (2007)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 90.3 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia building human resources rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Cpia building human resources rating in Bolivia, Plurinational State of was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- How does Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank for cpia building human resources rating?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 39th out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
- Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Bolivia, Plurinational State of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Bolivia, Plurinational State of data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.