Statizoid

CPIA fiscal policy rating in Bolivia

Bolivia: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling

Latest (2015)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 12.5%
World rank
18th
of 84 countries
All-time high
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA fiscal policy rating in Bolivia, 2005–2015

012342005201020152005: 4 1=low to 6=high2006: 4 1=low to 6=high2007: 4 1=low to 6=high2008: 4 1=low to 6=high2009: 4 1=low to 6=high2010: 4 1=low to 6=high2011: 4 1=low to 6=high2012: 4 1=low to 6=high2013: 4 1=low to 6=high2014: 4 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Bolivia recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia fiscal policy rating in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is down 12.5% on the previous year and down 12.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Bolivia peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.

That places Bolivia 18th out of 84 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

CPIA fiscal policy rating in Bolivia, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 4 1=low to 6=high —
2006 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high -12.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.92 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Bolivia

  1. 18 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 18 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 18 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 18 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 18 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 18 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 18 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 18 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 18 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 18 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 18 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 18 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 18 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 18 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 18 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 18 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 18 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 18 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 18 Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 18 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 18 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 18 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 18 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 18 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 18 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for Bolivia

All data for Bolivia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Bolivia?
Cpia fiscal policy rating in Bolivia was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Bolivia?
The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Bolivia?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
How does Bolivia rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
Bolivia ranks 18th out of 84 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Bolivia?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bolivia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA fiscal policy rating in Bolivia. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-fiscal-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-fiscal-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/">CPIA fiscal policy rating in Bolivia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.