CPIA fiscal policy rating in Kenya
Kenya: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Kenya, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Kenya recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia fiscal policy rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is down 12.5% on the previous year and down 12.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Kenya peaked at 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2012 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.
Kenya ranks 18th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Kenya, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +12.5% |
| 2013 | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | -11.1% |
| 2015 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2018 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +14.3% |
| 2023 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.95 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kenya
- 18 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 18 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kenya
- Arms imports 17.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.3012 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -75 % change on previous year (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 17.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 21.82 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0102 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 16.84 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.23 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 1.72 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Kenya?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Kenya was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Kenya?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Kenya?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
- How does Kenya rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Kenya ranks 18th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Kenya?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Kenya data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.