CPIA fiscal policy rating in India

India: CPIA fiscal policy rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
18th
of 84 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2006
All-time low
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
9
2005–2013

CPIA fiscal policy rating in India, 2005–2013

012342005200920132005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

India recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia fiscal policy rating in 2013. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

That represents a change of up 16.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in India peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

India ranks 18th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

CPIA fiscal policy rating in India, year by year

Annual values for CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in India, 2005 to 2013.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3 1=low to 6=high
2006 3.5 1=low to 6=high +16.7%
2007 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.4 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 4

Countries ranked near India

  1. 18 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 18 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 18 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 18 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 18 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 18 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 18 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 18 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 18 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 18 Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 18 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 18 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 18 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 18 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 18 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 18 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 18 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 18 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 18 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 18 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 18 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 18 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 18 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 18 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 18 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More public sector data for India

All data for India →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia fiscal policy rating in India?
Cpia fiscal policy rating in India was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in India?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in India?
The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does India rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
India ranks 18th out of 84 countries with data for 2013.
Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in India?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this India data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA fiscal policy rating in India. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-fiscal-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-fiscal-policy-rating-1-low-to-6-high/india/">CPIA fiscal policy rating in India</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.