CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in Congo
Congo: CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA fiscal policy rating in Congo, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia fiscal policy rating in Congo stood at 3.5 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia fiscal policy rating in Congo peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2007.
That places Congo 19th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high) in Congo, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2007 | 2 1=low to 6=high | -20.0% |
| 2008 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +25.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Congo compared with similar countries
- Congo's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Congo's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3.25 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 19 Bangladesh 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Bhutan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Bolivia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Cape Verde 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Chad 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Guyana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Liberia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Saint Lucia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Zimbabwe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Congo
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 9.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.5091 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0002 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2021)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -66.67 % change on previous year (2015)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia fiscal policy rating in Congo?
- Cpia fiscal policy rating in Congo was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia fiscal policy rating recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2007.
- How does Congo rank for cpia fiscal policy rating?
- Congo ranks 19th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia fiscal policy rating rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA fiscal policy rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.