CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in Fiji
Fiji: CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA macroeconomic management rating in Fiji, 2020–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia macroeconomic management rating in Fiji is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
That places Fiji 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high) in Fiji, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Fiji compared with similar countries
- Fiji's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4 1=low to 6=high, 75% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Fiji's 3 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Fiji
- 57 Angola 3 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Bolivia 3 1=low to 6=high
- 57 Burundi 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Micronesia (country) 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Mozambique 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Nepal 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sao Tome and Principe 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Solomon Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 East Timor 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 57 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Fiji
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 17.23 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0027 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 16.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia macroeconomic management rating in Fiji?
- Cpia macroeconomic management rating in Fiji was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Fiji?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- What is the lowest cpia macroeconomic management rating recorded in Fiji?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
- How does Fiji rank for cpia macroeconomic management rating?
- Fiji ranks 57th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia macroeconomic management rating rising or falling in Fiji?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Fiji data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA macroeconomic management rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA macroeconomic management cluster assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policy, as well as debt policy and management.