Statizoid

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia

Europe & Central Asia: CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.25 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 4.0%
Rank
6th
of 42 groups
All-time high
3.25 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
All-time low
2.88 1=low to 6=high
in 2020
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia, 2005–2025

01232005201520252005: 3 1=low to 6=high2006: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2007: 3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3 1=low to 6=high2012: 3 1=low to 6=high2013: 3 1=low to 6=high2014: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3 1=low to 6=high2019: 3 1=low to 6=high2020: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2021: 3 1=low to 6=high2022: 3 1=low to 6=high2023: 3 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.1 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.2 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Europe & Central Asia recorded 3.25 1=low to 6=high for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.0% on the previous year and up 8.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 2.88 1=low to 6=high, in 2020.

That places Europe & Central Asia 6th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 2.95 1=low to 6=high —
2006 2.9 1=low to 6=high -1.7%
2007 3 1=low to 6=high +3.4%
2008 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 2.9 1=low to 6=high -3.3%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high +3.4%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 2.88 1=low to 6=high -4.2%
2021 3 1=low to 6=high +4.3%
2022 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.12 1=low to 6=high +4.2%
2025 3.25 1=low to 6=high +4.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.97 1=low to 6=high 2.9 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 2.99 1=low to 6=high 2.9 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.04 1=low to 6=high 2.88 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia

  1. 9 Armenia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 9 Benin 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 9 Côte d'Ivoire 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 9 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 9 Georgia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 9 Grenada 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 9 India 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 9 Kenya 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 9 Kiribati 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 9 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 9 Kyrgyzstan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 9 Malawi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 9 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 9 Micronesia, Federated States of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 9 Republic of Moldova 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 9 Rwanda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 9 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 9 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 9 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 9 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 9 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 9 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 9 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Europe & Central Asia

All data for Europe & Central Asia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia?
Cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
The highest recorded value was 3.25 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
What is the lowest cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
The lowest recorded value was 2.88 1=low to 6=high in 2020.
How does Europe & Central Asia rank for cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 6th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
Is cpia property rights and rule-based governance rating rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-property-rights-and-rule-based-governance-rating-1-low-to-6-high/europe-and-central-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-property-rights-and-rule-based-governance-rating-1-low-to-6-high/europe-and-central-asia/">CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating in Europe & Central Asia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.