Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) was 734.45 million in 2020. ▼ Falling
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Equatorial Guinea, 2015–2020
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protection of biodiversity and landscape in Equatorial Guinea is 734.45 million, measured in 2020. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is down 25.6% on the previous year and down 39.9% over ten years.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 39th of 92 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.22 billion | — |
| 2016 | 1.13 billion | -7.6% |
| 2017 | 1.15 billion | +1.3% |
| 2018 | 921.70 million | -19.5% |
| 2019 | 986.70 million | +7.1% |
| 2020 | 734.45 million | -25.6% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 734.45 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 780.67 million, 94% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 734.45 million is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 206.66 million, 3.6× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.08 billion | 921.70 million | 1.22 billion | 5 |
| 2020s | 734.45 million | 734.45 million | 734.45 million | 1 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
- 36 Kyrgyzstan 920.00 million compare
- 37 Ukraine 914.40 million compare
- 38 Guatemala 780.67 million compare
- 40 Poland 730.60 million compare
- 41 United Kingdom 532.00 million compare
- 42 Switzerland 446.69 million compare
More public sector data for Equatorial Guinea
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 12.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 6.34 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0009 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -96.67 % change on previous year (2013)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape in Equatorial Guinea?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Equatorial Guinea was 734.45 million in 2020, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 1.22 billion in 2015.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 734.45 million in 2020.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 39th out of 92 countries with data for 2020.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 39.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).