Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) was 920.00 million in 2022. ▲ Rising
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Kyrgyzstan, 2014–2022
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
In 2022, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Kyrgyzstan stood at 920.00 million. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is up 58.0% on the previous year and up 55.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 920.00 million in 2022 and was at its lowest, 571.80 million, in 2020.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th of 92 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 593.38 million | — |
| 2015 | 731.50 million | +23.3% |
| 2016 | 865.20 million | +18.3% |
| 2017 | 698.60 million | -19.3% |
| 2018 | 890.60 million | +27.5% |
| 2019 | 712.40 million | -20.0% |
| 2020 | 571.80 million | -19.7% |
| 2021 | 582.16 million | +1.8% |
| 2022 | 920.00 million | +58.0% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 920.00 million is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 12.88 million, 71.4× the median. (9 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 920.00 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 302.00 million, 3.0× the median. (42 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 748.61 million | 593.38 million | 890.60 million | 6 |
| 2020s | 691.32 million | 571.80 million | 920.00 million | 3 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More public sector data for Kyrgyzstan
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 54.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 7.47 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0035 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 278.57 % change on previous year (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape in Kyrgyzstan?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Kyrgyzstan was 920.00 million in 2022, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 920.00 million in 2022.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 571.80 million in 2020.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th out of 92 countries with data for 2022.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 55.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).