Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Guatemala
Guatemala: Protection of biodiversity and landscape was 780.67 million in 2022. ▲ Rising
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Guatemala, 2014–2022
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Analysis
Guatemala recorded 780.67 million for protection of biodiversity and landscape in 2022. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.
The figure is up 11.9% on the previous year and up 142.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protection of biodiversity and landscape in Guatemala peaked at 780.67 million in 2022 and was at its lowest, 321.79 million, in 2014.
Guatemala ranks 38th of 92 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 321.79 million | — |
| 2015 | 435.57 million | +35.4% |
| 2016 | 493.21 million | +13.2% |
| 2017 | 490.21 million | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 550.08 million | +12.2% |
| 2019 | 603.43 million | +9.7% |
| 2020 | 678.11 million | +12.4% |
| 2021 | 697.44 million | +2.9% |
| 2022 | 780.67 million | +11.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 482.38 million | 321.79 million | 603.43 million | 6 |
| 2020s | 718.74 million | 678.11 million | 780.67 million | 3 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 35 New Zealand 1.02 billion compare
- 36 Kyrgyzstan 920.00 million compare
- 37 Ukraine 914.40 million compare
- 39 Equatorial Guinea 734.45 million compare
- 40 Poland 730.60 million compare
- 41 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 532.00 million compare
More public sector data for Guatemala
- Arms imports 6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.331 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -40 % change on previous year (2023)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 6.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2023)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 22.56 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0037 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -5.13 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 415.19 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 55.99 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protection of biodiversity and landscape in Guatemala?
- Protection of biodiversity and landscape in Guatemala was 780.67 million in 2022, according to International Monetary Fund.
- What is the highest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 780.67 million in 2022.
- What is the lowest protection of biodiversity and landscape recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 321.79 million in 2014.
- How does Guatemala rank for protection of biodiversity and landscape?
- Guatemala ranks 38th out of 92 countries with data for 2022.
- Is protection of biodiversity and landscape rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 142.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from International Monetary Fund, published as part of Protection of biodiversity and landscape (Domestic Currency). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset captures government spending on environmental protection efforts such as pollution abatement, biodiversity conservation, and waste management. These expenditures are classified according to the COFOG framework (Classification of the Functions of Government).