CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Bolivia
Bolivia: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▬ Flat
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Bolivia, 2005–2015
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Bolivia is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2015. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Bolivia peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Bolivia 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2015, putting it in the top quarter.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Bolivia, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Bolivia compared with similar countries
- Bolivia's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Bolivia's 3.5 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bolivia
- 17 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Democratic Republic of Congo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Laos 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Niger 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Bolivia
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 0 SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -23.53 % change on previous year (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Bolivia?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Bolivia was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Bolivia?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Bolivia?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Bolivia rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Bolivia ranks 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Bolivia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bolivia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.