CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Maldives
Maldives: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Maldives, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Maldives recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in 2025.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Maldives peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.
That places Maldives 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Maldives, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2016 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +33.3% |
| 2020 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2022 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Maldives
- 17 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Niger 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Uzbekistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 17 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Maldives
- Arms imports 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 13.26 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 7.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 6,667 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2021)
- Tax revenue 19.5% (2021)
- Capital stock, General government, Current prices, Domestic currency 110.64 (2019)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 12.7% (2021)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Percent of GDP 133.64 (2019)
- Capital stock, General government, Constant prices, Purchasing power 14.77 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Maldives?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Maldives was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Maldives?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Maldives?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
- How does Maldives rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Maldives ranks 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Maldives?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Maldives data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.