Statizoid

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
3.5 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
17th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
Years of data
21
2005–2025

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan, 2005–2025

012342005201520252005: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2020: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2021: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2022: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2023: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2024: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2025: 3.5 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Uzbekistan recorded 3.5 1=low to 6=high for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.

That places Uzbekistan 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top quarter.

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan, year by year

Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.5 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2012 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2016 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2019 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2022 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2023 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 3.5 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10
2020s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Uzbekistan

  1. 17 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 17 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 17 Burundi 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 17 Cambodia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 17 Cameroon 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 17 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 17 Dominica 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  8. 17 Gambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 17 Ghana 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 17 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  11. 17 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  12. 17 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  13. 17 Maldives 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  14. 17 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  15. 17 Mongolia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  16. 17 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  17. 17 Nepal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  18. 17 Niger 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  19. 17 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  20. 17 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  21. 17 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  22. 17 Sierra Leone 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  23. 17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  24. 17 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  25. 17 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  26. 17 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
  27. 17 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More public sector data for Uzbekistan

All data for Uzbekistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan?
Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Uzbekistan?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Uzbekistan?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
How does Uzbekistan rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
Uzbekistan ranks 17th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-policy-and-institutions-for-environmental-sustainability-rating-1-low-to-6-high/uzbekistan/">CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Uzbekistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.