CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kiribati
Kiribati: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kiribati, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kiribati is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kiribati peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
That places Kiribati 45th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 86% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 3 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 45 Armenia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Chad 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Georgia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guinea-Bissau 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Honduras 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Micronesia (country) 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tanzania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Yemen 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Kiribati
- Democracy, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Tax revenue 17.5% (2023)
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains 7.4% (2023)
- Taxes on goods and services 11.8% (2023)
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets 7.1% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kiribati?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Kiribati was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Kiribati rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Kiribati ranks 45th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.