CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Madagascar
Madagascar: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Madagascar, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Madagascar recorded 3 1=low to 6=high for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Madagascar peaked at 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3 1=low to 6=high, in 2012.
Madagascar ranks 45th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Madagascar, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 4 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -12.5% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Madagascar compared with similar countries
- Madagascar's 3 1=low to 6=high is above the median for low income countries, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
- Madagascar's 3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3.5 1=low to 6=high, 86% of the median. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Madagascar
- 45 Armenia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Chad 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Georgia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guinea-Bissau 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Honduras 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Micronesia (country) 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tanzania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Yemen 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Madagascar
- Democracy, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Chief executive of the government is elected, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Universal right to vote in practice, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (2025)
- Arms imports 3.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2025)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.0345 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2020)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0001 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2020)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Madagascar?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Madagascar was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Madagascar?
- The highest recorded value was 4 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Madagascar?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- How does Madagascar rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Madagascar ranks 45th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Madagascar?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Madagascar data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.