CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Yemen
Yemen: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Yemen, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Yemen is 3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
The figure is up 20.0% on the previous year and unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Yemen peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2008 and was at its lowest, 2.5 1=low to 6=high, in 2017.
That places Yemen 45th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Yemen, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +16.7% |
| 2009 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | -14.3% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | -16.7% |
| 2018 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 2.95 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.58 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Yemen
- 45 Armenia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Chad 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Georgia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guinea-Bissau 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Honduras 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Liberia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Micronesia, Federated States of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Yemen
- Arms imports 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0.0262 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0004 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2018)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate 50 % change on previous year (2018)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 1.00 million SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 56.73 current USD per person (2014)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0397 current USD per US$ of GDP (2014)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 4.01 % change on previous year (2014)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 1.71 billion current USD (2014)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 1.89 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Yemen?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Yemen was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Yemen?
- The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Yemen?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 6=high in 2017.
- How does Yemen rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Yemen ranks 45th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Yemen?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Yemen data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.