CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Liberia
Liberia: CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Liberia, 2009–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Liberia stood at 3 1=low to 6=high. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Liberia peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 2 1=low to 6=high, in 2009.
Liberia ranks 45th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Liberia, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010 | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | +25.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +20.0% |
| 2012 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 1 |
| 2010s | 2.95 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Liberia
- 45 Armenia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Azerbaijan 3 1=low to 6=high
- 45 Bangladesh 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Chad 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Comoros 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Ethiopia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Georgia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guinea-Bissau 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Guyana 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Honduras 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Kiribati 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Kyrgyzstan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Madagascar 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Marshall Islands 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Mauritania 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Micronesia, Federated States of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Nigeria 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Pakistan 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Sri Lanka 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tonga 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Tuvalu 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Yemen 3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 45 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Liberia
- Arms imports 0 SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2022)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 0 SIPRI trend indicator values (2022)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 6.03 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0071 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate -45.9 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 33.83 million current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 0 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2022)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per square kilometre 649.07 current USD per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Liberia?
- Cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating in Liberia was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Liberia?
- The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
- What is the lowest cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating recorded in Liberia?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- How does Liberia rank for cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating?
- Liberia ranks 45th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating rising or falling in Liberia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Liberia data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA policy and institutions for environmental sustainability rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This criterion assesses the extent to which environmental policies and institutions foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.