CPIA building human resources rating in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan: CPIA building human resources rating was 2.6 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA building human resources rating in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan recorded 2.6 1=low to 6=high for cpia building human resources rating in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 9.6% on the previous year and down 20.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia building human resources rating in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan peaked at 3.38 1=low to 6=high in 2012 and was at its lowest, 2.6 1=low to 6=high, in 2025.
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 40th of 42 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA building human resources rating in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | -2.5% |
| 2007 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | -3.8% |
| 2010 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +4.0% |
| 2012 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +3.8% |
| 2013 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | -3.7% |
| 2016 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | -3.8% |
| 2018 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | -2.6% |
| 2022 | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | -9.2% |
| 2023 | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | -9.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.26 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.94 1=low to 6=high | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- 39 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Burkina Faso 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Eritrea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Fiji 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Guinea 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Kosovo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Lao People's Democratic Republic 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Lesotho 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Madagascar 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Mali 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Marshall Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Mozambique 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nicaragua 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Nigeria 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Pakistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Samoa 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Sao Tome and Principe 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Solomon Islands 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tajikistan 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Togo 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Tonga 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Uganda 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Vanuatu 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Zambia 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 39 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
More public sector data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan
- Arms imports 6.14 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per capita 7.55 SIPRI trend indicator values per person (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per unit of GDP 0.0012 SIPRI trend indicator values per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), annual growth rate -41.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), gaps filled 6.14 billion SIPRI trend indicator values (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per capita 246.67 current USD per person (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), per unit of GDP 0.0393 current USD per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), annual growth rate 15.09 % change on previous year (2024)
- Military expenditure (current USD), gaps filled 200.58 billion current USD (2024)
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values), per square kilometre 831.08 SIPRI trend indicator values per square kilometre (2023)
All data for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan →
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia building human resources rating in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Cpia building human resources rating in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan was 2.6 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.38 1=low to 6=high in 2012.
- What is the lowest cpia building human resources rating recorded in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.6 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- How does Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan rank for cpia building human resources rating?
- Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan ranks 40th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia building human resources rating rising or falling in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.